No Self
In Buddhism one of the ‘Three
Characteristics’ is No-Self (the other two are impermanence and
suffering which are closely associated with this). This refers to the
illusion of reality having a permanent and separate self.
There is this notion that there is a
permanent “I” or “me,” which is a separate entity that can be found. The
obvious assumption of we are our body sounds good until we look at it
and say “this is my body,” which implies at that moment that whatever
owns the body wasn’t the body. The observer and the observed; duality
denies our body being what we are. It is also in a state of
impermanence, and at a sensate level it is made up of energy flickering
at a similar rate to reality.
Perhaps thoughts are the “I.” They may
seem more like the true “me” than the body does. But they come and go
and are changing constantly too, as well as the majority of them not
being under our control at all. They too aren’t something solid enough
to assume they are the “I.” The ego is a process of identification with
reality (physical and mental phenomena), not a thing in and of itself;
it is like a bad habit. Not being a thing, it cannot be destroyed as
some people say, but by understanding our bare experience, our mind, the
process of identification can stop.
There is also something frequently
called the “watcher” or “observer,” which is observing all of these
phenomena. Strangely, the watcher can’t be found either, as it seems to
sometimes be our eyes, sometimes not; sometimes it’s images in our head;
sometimes it seems to be our body and sometimes it’s watching the body.
It seems odd that this watcher to which all of this is being perceived
by, which seems separate from reality and which seems in control of “us”
is constantly changing and completely unfindable.
One of the biggest clues in solving this
mystery is that if we are observing it, then by definition it isn’t us.
Reality is made up entirely of sensations, and to begin to unravel this
mystery is to begin to awaken. Reality with a sense of a separate
watcher is a delusion. So who or what is it that awakens?
What Awakens?
In short, it’s all of this transience
that awakens! Here’s an explanation, keep in mind this is an attempt at summarizing something quite complicated. (Not really!)
No-Self teachings directly counter the
sense that there is a separate watcher, and that this watcher is “us”
that is in control, observing reality or subject to the tribulations of
the world. These teachings stop the process of mentally creating the
illusion of a separate self from sensations that are inherently non-dual
and utterly transient.
There are physical phenomena (everything
we perceive with our senses) and mental phenomena (thoughts, feelings,
emotions). These are just phenomena, and all phenomena aren’t a
permanent, separate self as they are completely impermanent and are
intimately interdependent. These phenomena arise and pass as we venture
through reality, i.e. the sound of a bird singing comes into existence
and then dissipates.
There is also awareness of these
phenomena, but awareness is not a thing or localised in a particular
place, so to even say “there is awareness” is already a large problem,
as it implies separateness and existence of it where none can be found.
Awareness is permanent and unchanging, and it is said that all things
arise from it, and all things return to it. It could be called God,
Nirvana, The Tao, Allah, the present moment, the Buddha nature or just
awareness.
While phenomena are in flux from their
arising to their passing, there is awareness of them. Thus, awareness is
not these phenomena, as it is not a thing, nor is it separate from
these objects, as there would be no experience if this were so.
True-Self
True-Self teachings point out that we
actually are all these phenomena, rather than them being seen as
observed. As phenomena are observed, they can’t possibly be the
observer. Thus, the observer, which is awareness, cannot possibly be a
phenomenon and thus is not localised and therefore doesn’t exist.
Duality implies something on both sides: an observer and an observed.
However, there is no phenomenal observer, so duality doesn’t hold up
under careful investigation. When the illusion of duality permanently
collapses in awakening, in direct experience, all that is left is these
phenomena, which is the True Self.
There’s a great little Buddhist poem by Kalu Rinpoche that sums all this up:
We live in illusion and the appearance of things.
There is a reality, we are that reality.
When you understand this, you will see “you” are nothing.
And, being nothing, you are everything.
Posts
